Chiropractic through the years

Chiropractic through the years

1915
January 1 1915

Hodgins Commission recommends shut down

In 1915, the Ontario government issued a report, the Hodgins Commission, an investigation into the state of medical education in Ontario. This report noted “new avenues of healing which had not previously been dreamed of,” including “bone setting”, “manipulation” and “mechanotherapy”. This commission reacted as expected and recommended that Ontario’s three chiropractic colleges be shut down. The commission did recognize the value in these methods and recommended they be added to the medical curriculum.

1925
January 1 1925

Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons attempts to limit chiropractors’ role in health care

In 1925 the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons in an effort to limit the chiropractors’ role in health care, requested the government enact legislation to regulate the health practitioners out of their jurisdiction. As a result the “Drugless Practitioners Act” of 1925 was enacted to regulate chiropractors, optometrists and other new professions. Chiropractic was now legal but strictly limited.

1937
January 1 1937

New regulations passed

In 1937, upon the recommendation of the Honourable the Attorney-General, new regulations were passed which “further emphasized the requirement ‘by diagnosis’ for chiropractors by inserting the words ‘(including all diagnostic methods)’”. According to the College of Physicians and Surgeons this was an amendment: … that was vicious from the standpoint of the College and certainly contrary to the intention of the Legislature that those under The Drugless Practitioners Act were to be limited to ‘treatment’ in the ordinary meaning of the term as something quite apart from diagnosis. These expanded definitions have been troublesome to the College ever since, making it almost impossible to successfully prosecute a drugless practitioner for illegal practice, and laying a base for the right to enjoy the facilities of the Provincial Laboratories as a diagnostic aid.

source:  Chiropractic: From rejection to acceptance.

1955
January 1 1955

Board of Directors of Chiropractic was advised that it no longer had control over unethical advertising

In 1955 the regulations were again changed by the government and the Board of Directors of Chiropractic was advised that it no longer had control over unethical advertising. This presented serious problems, not only for the Board, but also for the Ontario Chiropractic Association.
Many in responsible positions in the profession wondered why enabling legislation was being thwarted, by whom, and if these continuing events were deliberate. This removal of control over advertising from a piece of so-called “regulatory legislation”, was the direct result of
government action, and it was continued for an entire decade before the Department of Health could be convinced to restore the control. This was done simply by reauthorizing a regulation which had been in force from 1944 to 1955, and which the government itself had rescinded.

source: Chiropractic: From rejection to acceptance

1959
January 1 1959

College of Physicians and Surgeons attempt to enact restrictions

In 1959 the Ontario the College of Physicians and Surgeons published a report on “Osteopathy and Chiropractic” outlining a powerful offensive policy to give chiropractic in Ontario a knock back. This triggered several Royal Commissions throughout the 1960’s looking at the state of health care in Canada and chiropractic care in particular.

Source

1963
January 1 1963

American Medical Association (AMA) forms a committee to eliminate chiropractic

The American Medical Association (AMA) in 1963 formed a Committee on Quakery which worked to eliminate chiropractic. A primary method to achieve this goal was to make it unethical for medical physicians to professionally associate with chiropractors.

1966
January 1 1966

American Medical Association (AMA)’s House of Delegates passes resolution labelling chiropractic an unscientific cult

The American Medical Association (AMA)’s House of Delegates passed a resolution labelling chiropractic as an unscientific cult. The AMA’s purpose was to prevent medical physicians from referring patients to chiropractors and from accepting referrals of patients from chiropractors, to prevent chiropractors from obtaining access to hospital diagnostic services and membership on hospital staffs, to prevent medical physicians from teaching at chiropractic college’s or engaging in any joint research, and to prevent any co-operation in the delivery of health care services. The AMA indicated that its actions reflected a genuine and reasonable concern for scientific method in patient care.

1972
December 13 1972

Medical doctors steered from advising about chiropractors

Medical doctors should not sit or participate on regulatory or advisory boards where the conduct or qualifications of chiropractors are involved.

1974
March 19 1974

Chair, Section of Orthopedics, BCMA to president BCMA to lobby against chiropractic

Chair, Section of Orthopedics, BCMA to president BCMA to lobby against chiropractic.

May 1 1974

WCB has no objection to a transfer from a physician to a chiropractor or vice versa

WCB has no objection to a transfer from a physician to a chiropractor or vice versa.

May 15 1974

Letter to Worker’s Compensation Board BC opposing chiropractic

Letter from Registrar, CPS, to Worker’s Compensation Board BC opposing chiropractic and stating medical doctors would not work in co-operation with chiropractors.

May 21 1974

Requests for an independent Government investigation into the role of the chiropractor in the medical field

BC physio regulator/association invitation to CPSBC to attend meeting to organize a combined approach to MOH (BC Ministry of Health) to request an independent Government investigation into the role of the chiropractor in the medical field.

June 14 1974

Letter from BC orthopedic advocating against chiropractic

Letter from BC orthopedic section to BCMA Committee advocating against chiropractic but manipulation should belong to medical profession.

July 3 1974

Letter from Canadian Medical Association to American College of Surgeons

Letter from Canadian Medical Association to American College of Surgeons acknowledging US position and stating it represents the attitude of Canadian Medical Association and many affiliate societies.

July 3 1974

Canadian Medical Association circulates position

Canadian Medical Association circulates position of American College of Surgeons to Canadian medical affiliates.

July 18 1974

BC physio regulator/association tries to block chiropractors

BC physio regulator/association writes to CPSBC regarding preventing Doctor of Chiropractic from participating in the 5 government community human resource health centres. Reference to Interdisciplinary Meeting regarding chiropractic in BC.

August 8 1974

Letter discourages chiropractors from using x-rays

Letter from BC Division of Canadian Society of Radiologists indicating no official complaints or documentation of chiropractor’s negligence but appear to discourage “untrained” personnel using x-rays.

August 9 1974

Letter reaffirms suggestions not to release chiropractors or naturopaths information

Letter from American College of Surgeons which references Canadian Medical Association resolution “reaffirming” it is contrary to accepted medical practice to release to chiropractors or naturopaths information.

October 22 1974

Other health care professions say chiropractors are an unacceptable member of the “Health Team”

BC Physiotherapy Interdisciplinary Meeting on Chiropractic organizing other health professions to state chiropractors as an unacceptable member of the “Health Team”.

October 24 1974

BC Physio Regulatory/Association organizes campaign against chiropractic

BC Physio Regulatory/Association organizes campaign against chiropractic and submission to Minister of Health Dennis Cocke.

November 13 1974

Letter states chiropractic plays no role in health care

Letter from BCMA (referencing College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC) to BC Physiotherapy Association stating chiropractic plays no role in health care and cannot condone receiving or giving referrals by members of the health team.

November 15 1974

Letter opposes chiropractors but not chiropractic

Letter, page 1, from BC physio. Information to the Health Care Delivery Committee discusses chiropractic including manipulation should be part of curricula of medical doctors. (note – not opposing adjustment, manipulation, but only who is doing it)

December 12 1974

Letter states chiropractors should not be part of the health care team

Registrar CPSBC writes to MOH that chiropractors should not be part of the health care team. This correspondence references the CPSBC participation with other health profession including president of BC branch of Cdn physio association.

1975
February 12 1975

letter to St. Paul’s hospital…do not relate professionally with chiropractors

letter to St. Paul’s hospital, not to relate professionally in any way with chiropractors.

May 23 1975

Letter says emphatically the chiropractor is not acceptable as a member of the “Health Care Team”

Letter from BC branch of Canadian Physio Association to CPSBC which includes information in a brief stating emphatically the chiropractor is not acceptable as a member of the “Health Care Team”.

October 29 1975

American Medical Association opposition to chiropractic may violate antitrust laws

The New York Times released an article revealing that, “The staff of the House Oversight, and Investigation subcommittee has concluded that the campaign of the American Medical Association to eliminate chiropractic service in the United States may violate the antitrust laws.

1976
January 5 1976

Unethical to refer to Doctor of Chiropractic and correspondence

WCB and CPSBC regarding adjudicator training advising unethical to refer to Doctor of Chiropractic and correspondence and advice to worker regarding informing physician.

June 10 1976

Letter to medical Registrars of all provinces seeking position on chiropractic

Letter to medical Registrars of all provinces seeking position on chiropractic. States BC CPS … unethical for a physician to enable a person not registered to practice medicine, surgery or midwifery. Radiologists will not accept requests from chiropractors. Requests position of each CPS.

September 8 1976

patients not entitled to obtain copies of their medical records but entitled to have them transferred to another physician

Letter to Vancouver Province newspaper stating patients not entitled to obtain copies of their medical records but entitled to have them transferred to another physician. (amended by legislation and later CPS information.)

October 26 1976

Combines Act and consideration of amendment to Medical Act regarding chiropractic

Letter to CPS directors regarding Combines Act and consideration of amendment to Medical Act regarding chiropractic. Reference to Derek Gellman info to chiropractors.

October 26 1976

Radiologists advised against preforming work for chiropractors

Position of Canadian Association of Radiologists: Reports and documents against performing diagnostic imaging for patients of Doctor of Chiropractic.

November 29 1976

Medical doctors are ethically prohibited from referring to a Doctor of Chiropractic

letter to BC CPS registrant stating medical doctors are ethically prohibited from referring to a Doctor of Chiropractic.

November 29 1976

Lobby against patient referral to x-ray facility not to take referral from Doctor of Chiropractic

Lobby against patient referral to x-ray facility not to take referral from Doctor of Chiropractic. Letter to MOH.

1979
January 9 1979

Physio Association writes to CPS advising opposing chiropractic act

Physio Association writes to CPS advising opposing chiropractic act to include extremities and asks CPS to meet to discuss prior to further meetings with MOH.

April 6 1979

Physicians not associate with nor provide any assistance to chiropractic

CPS policy physicians not associate with nor provide any assistance to the practice of chiropractic.

1981
January 21 1981

Not appropriate for laboratory physicians to accept and act on requisitions from chiropractors

CPS Resolution 81-25 that it is not appropriate for laboratory physicians to accept and act on requisitions from chiropractors (and naturopaths).

1983
July 1 1983

British Columbia government introduced Bill 24

The British Columbia government introduced Bill 24, a new Medical Services Act. Significant changes from the present legislation included the following: the Medical Services Plan (MSP) was given enhanced authority to establish and modify payment schedules for different practitioners and different classes of practitioners; and the prohibition against balance billing was extended to all practitioners billing under the plan.

1985
January 1 1985

100th anniversary of chiropractic

100th anniversary when Daniel David Palmer in Davenport, Iowa, founded chiropractic in 1895

June 25 1985

Medical doctors should not practice in association with chiropractors

CPS letter to CCBC Registrar that medical doctors should not practice in association with chiropractors nor refer the patient to the chiropractor for opinion or treatment.

1986
May 15 1986

Physicians should not associate themselves with chiropractors

Following a meeting with BCCA, minutes of CPS states chiropractic is an alternative to medicine. Physicians should not associate themselves in practice with chiropractors.

1987
January 1 1987

AMA violates Sherman Act

The United States DistriC1 Court held in 1987 that the AMA and its members, through these actions, had violated the United States Sherman Act by unlawfully conspiring to restrain trade.

September 4 1987

Vancouver Sun report of US Court ruling of conspiracy

Vancouver Sun report of US Court ruling of conspiracy. BC CPS is also quoted as saying they do not condone association of medical doctors and chiropractors.

1989
June 8 1989

BCMA document of meeting planning opposition to chiropractic school

BCMA document of meeting planning opposition to chiropractic school including political action.

November 8 1989

Physiotherapy Association soliciting support to oppose a chiropractic school at UVIC

Physiotherapy Association of BC (PABC) writes to CPS soliciting support to oppose a chiropractic school at UVIC. Additional reference to allied professions supporting legitimate medicine in the province and western world.

November 27 1989

Document indicates opposition of medicine to chiropractic school

CPS writes to PABC advising of document indicating opposition of medicine to chiropractic school and will continue to support the excellent work of the PABC on the matter.

1990
July 1 1990

Impacts to stakeholders including WorkSafeBC and ICBC

CPS policy that medical doctors not associate, refer, approve DC patient care. (note this impacts stakeholders including WorkSafeBC, ICBC medical legal reports among patient care decision making)

July 4 1990

CPS letter “…medical doctors must not associate with Doctors of Chiropractic.”

CPS letter to Doctors of Chiropractic stating medical doctors must not associate with Doctors of Chiropractic and not refer patient to Doctors of Chiropractic for treatment or opinion.

1991
January 1 1991

“Regulated Health Professions Act” replaces the Drugless Practitioners Act of 1925

In 1991 as the “Regulated Health Professions Act”. This act replaced the Drugless Practitioners Act of 1925 in regulating chiropractors. This new statute authorized the use of the title “doctor” and granted the right to diagnose, which only four other professions had: optometry, dentistry, medicine and psychology (podiatry was later added). The College of Chiropractors of Ontario was established giving the profession the right of self-regulation under the same legal parameters as the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

March 1 1991

Submission by Competition Bureau to Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs

Submission by Competition Bureau to Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs. Discusses the conduct of the College of Physicians and Surgeons and BCMA.

1994
June 15 1994

CPS position and advises WorkSafeBC the BCMA will not participate in an appeal panel that includes Doctors of Chiropractic

Proposals for Comment on Medical Review Panel Process. BCMA cites CPS position and advises WorkSafeBC the BCMA will not participate in an appeal panel that includes DCs nor accept decisions where the panel member includes a Doctor of Chiropractic.

1995
May 1 1995

CPS advises it is involved in national and provincial discussion on chiropractic

CPS letter to MOH general discussion of chiropractic and new BCMA committee on non traditional medicine. CPS advises it is involved in national and provincial discussion on chiropractic. Reference is made to the College’s submission to the Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs, January 1991 regarding its opposition to chiropractic.

1996
December 23 1996

CPA remains opposed to direct referrals of patients to chiropractors

Letter from CPS, Deputy Registrar to St. Anthony’s Medical Centre Victoria, BC. The College’s current position is that remains opposed to direct referrals of patients to chiropractors or to co-management of patients with chiropractors.

2007
April 10 2007

CPS “accredited medical diagnostic facilities may not accept referral from Doctor of Chiropractic”

Canada Diagnostics advises CPS directs that government accredited medical diagnostic facilities may not accept referral from Doctor of Chiropractic.

2009
December 1 2009

CPS resolution 81-25 affirmed that radiologists not accept requisitions from chiropractors

CPS resolution 81-25 affirmed that radiologists not accept requisitions from chiropractors. CPS RFA #Board C-0912-D to include BC Radiologists and BC Association of Laboratory Physicians.

2010
March 1 2010

CPS “pathologists and radiologists should not accept requisitions from chiropractors”

The CPS communicates in the College Quarterly that pathologists and radiologists should not accept requisitions from chiropractors.